Revel

  • Published by Pearson
Last evaluated
10/30/2023

Revel improves results by empowering students to actively participate in learning. More than a digital textbook, Revel delivers an engaging blend of author content, media, and assessment. With Revel, students read and practice in one continuous experience. Interactive content and assessments integrated throughout the narrative provide opportunities for students to explore and apply concepts. And Revel is mobile and user-friendly, so students can learn on the go: anytime, anywhere, on any device.


How CourseGateway Reviews Products

Reviews are established through an evaluation process applied to each courseware product.

How CourseGateway Reviews Products

Reviews are established through an evaluation process applied to each courseware product.

10/30/2023

Overall

Overall

Pearson Revel demonstrates significant evidence of accessible functionality and moderate evidence of documenting product accessibility. There is an area for growth in supplier accessibility maturity. Efficacy reviews display limited evidence in all areas of assessment, with a desire for more information on research design support and third-party participation in efficacy research. Equity showcases strengths in language and student representation. Revel’s equity reviews have the most potential for development in design and product development, student support, and learning outcomes. Functionality offers room for enhancement, with its most positive attributes in usability. Reviewers found least evidence of functionality considerations in communication and collaboration, customization, and learner guidance. System capabilities show advantages in data privacy and ownership, while most other areas of consideration for the review category show minimum evidence to support. Ultimately, accessibility and equity perform best, while minimum evidence is available to support the product’s efficacy, system capabilities, and functionality. 

Product Review Scale: 
0 - No Evidence; 1 - Minimum Evidence; 2 - Moderate Evidence; 3 - Significant Evidence

Products listed on the CourseGateway site are reviewed by a trusted Product Advisory Board and higher education professionals. 

Overall

Pearson Revel demonstrates significant evidence of accessible functionality and moderate evidence of documenting product accessibility. There is an area for growth in supplier accessibility maturity. Efficacy reviews display limited evidence in all areas of assessment, with a desire for more information on research design support and third-party participation in efficacy research. Equity showcases strengths in language and student representation. Revel’s equity reviews have the most potential for development in design and product development, student support, and learning outcomes. Functionality offers room for enhancement, with its most positive attributes in usability. Reviewers found least evidence of functionality considerations in communication and collaboration, customization, and learner guidance. System capabilities show advantages in data privacy and ownership, while most other areas of consideration for the review category show minimum evidence to support. Ultimately, accessibility and equity perform best, while minimum evidence is available to support the product’s efficacy, system capabilities, and functionality. 

Product Review Scale: 
0 - No Evidence; 1 - Minimum Evidence; 2 - Moderate Evidence; 3 - Significant Evidence

Products listed on the CourseGateway site are reviewed by a trusted Product Advisory Board and higher education professionals. 

Accessibility

2.5 / 3
Average Accessibility Rating

Accessibility

2.5 / 3
Average Accessibility Rating

2.5 / 3
Average Accessibility Rating

Accessible Functionality
Documenting Product Accessibility
Supplier Accessibility Maturity

Efficacy

1 / 3
Average Efficacy Rating

Efficacy

1 / 3
Average Efficacy Rating

1 / 3
Average Efficacy Rating

Case Studies
Evidence Across Institution Types
Research design support
Rigorous Methodologies
Third-Party Efficacy Research

Equity

1.5 / 3
Average Equity Rating

Equity

1.5 / 3
Average Equity Rating

1.5 / 3
Average Equity Rating

Design and Product Development
Language
Learning Activities
Outcomes
Student representation
Student Supports

Functionality

1.5 / 3
Average Functionality Rating

Functionality

1.5 / 3
Average Functionality Rating

1.5 / 3
Average Functionality Rating

Adaptivity
Communication and Collaboration
Customization
Enables evidence-base teaching practices
Learner Guidance
Measurement and Structure
Usability

Systems Capabilities

1.5 / 3
Average Systems Capabilities Rating

Systems Capabilities

1.5 / 3
Average Systems Capabilities Rating

1.5 / 3
Average Systems Capabilities Rating

Content Management
Course Administration
Data Access
Data as Support
Data Privacy and Ownership
Third-Party Applications

CourseGateway Reviews

All of the products listed on the CourseGateway site are reviewed by a trusted Product Advisory Board and additional courseware users. A governance board oversees the review process followed by our reviewers.

CourseGateway Reviews

All of the products listed on the CourseGateway site are reviewed by a trusted Product Advisory Board and additional courseware users. A governance board oversees the review process followed by our reviewers.

Courses

American Government/Politics
Introductory English Composition
Introductory Psychology
Introductory Sociology
Macroeconomics Principles
Marketing Principles
Microeconomics Principles
U.S. History Survey (All Periods)
Disciplines

Business
Computer Science
Economics
English
History
Political Science
Psychology
Sociology
LMS Integrations

Blackboard
Brightspace
Canvas
Moodle
Sakai
Schoology

How CourseGateway Reviews Products

Reviews are established through an evaluation process applied to each courseware product.

How CourseGateway Reviews Products

Reviews are established through an evaluation process applied to each courseware product.